Listen now | Katherine and Gio discuss the Cut's Andrew Huberman profile, what does and doesn't count as "being political," emo kids, and which up-and-coming public intellectuals they want to model themselves after.
Various things in your analysis make me think maybe you don’t really understand the podcast or its audience. Like referring to Huberman as Jordan Peterson esque, or the idea that his followers are predisposed to distrust the media. While he is a jacked dude, there’s really nothing about masculinity in the podcast, and nothing explicitly about politics. It’s a general health podcast including mental and physical aspects of health. Maybe some similarities in terms of self-improvement focus but leftists and women are also Huberman’s audience. I’m sure there are many people who both listen to him and would read NY magazine. Nice episode in general tho!
Various things in your analysis make me think maybe you don’t really understand the podcast or its audience. Like referring to Huberman as Jordan Peterson esque, or the idea that his followers are predisposed to distrust the media. While he is a jacked dude, there’s really nothing about masculinity in the podcast, and nothing explicitly about politics. It’s a general health podcast including mental and physical aspects of health. Maybe some similarities in terms of self-improvement focus but leftists and women are also Huberman’s audience. I’m sure there are many people who both listen to him and would read NY magazine. Nice episode in general tho!
Various things in your analysis make me think maybe you don’t really understand the podcast or its audience. Like referring to Huberman as Jordan Peterson esque, or the idea that his followers are predisposed to distrust the media. While he is a jacked dude, there’s really nothing about masculinity in the podcast, and nothing explicitly about politics. It’s a general health podcast including mental and physical aspects of health. Maybe some similarities in terms of self-improvement focus but leftists and women are also Huberman’s audience. I’m sure there are many people who both listen to him and would read NY magazine. Nice episode in general tho!
Various things in your analysis make me think maybe you don’t really understand the podcast or its audience. Like referring to Huberman as Jordan Peterson esque, or the idea that his followers are predisposed to distrust the media. While he is a jacked dude, there’s really nothing about masculinity in the podcast, and nothing explicitly about politics. It’s a general health podcast including mental and physical aspects of health. Maybe some similarities in terms of self-improvement focus but leftists and women are also Huberman’s audience. I’m sure there are many people who both listen to him and would read NY magazine. Nice episode in general tho!
Very enjoyable 😊
Thanks you two.